Search This Blog

Saturday, March 30, 2019

BAHRAIN FORMULA 2: CANADIAN LATIFI DOMINATES


F2 Media
30 March, 201



DAMS driver Nicolas Latifi dominated an entertaining feature Formula 2 race in Bahrain, while series debutant Mick Schumacher impressed to turn 10th on the grid to eighth in the race with Prema, and earning the pole position start for tomorrow’s feature race due to the reverse grid rules.

Latifi claimed the first win of the 2019 FIA Formula 2 Championship season with a storming drive in this afternoon’s Race 1 at the Bahrain International Circuit in Sakhir, making a strong start and overcoming a slow pitstop for victory ahead of Luca Ghiotto and DAMS teammate Sergio Sette Câmara.

The groundwork for the Canadian’s victory was laid at the start: polesitter Ghiotto had a poor start, fellow front row starter Louis Delétraz had a better one, while storming starts by Nyck de Vries and Latifi saw the Dutchman move up to P2 at turn 1 but the Canadian blast past him at turn 4, with the top 3 already pulling away from Jack Aitken, Nobuharu Matsushita, Ghiotto, Anthoine Hubert and Nikita Mazepin, while a poor start for Sette Câmara saw the Brazilian drop from p7 on the grid to P13 at the end of the first lap.

Sette Câmara was soon moving back up through the order, recovering to P8 by lap 5, while out in front the leaders were looking to break the DRS gap to each as well as manage their tyres, a tricky balancing act at the hot, dry circuit, with a view to going as long as possible before the stops.

Nobody told Ghiotto though, as the Italian looked to reclaim ground lost at the start as he sliced his way by his rivals, claiming P2 from Delétraz on lap 13 as de Vries came into the pits, the first of the leaders to do so.

The Dutchman was now the target as his rivals came in, and emerging in fresh air helped de Vries to move up the order. Race leader Latifi came in on lap 16, but a slow rear tyre change saw the Canadian emerge behind Delétraz and with a mountain to climb if he was to return to the front, while Ghiotto spent one more lap out but lost time in the process, coming out P6 of the stoppers behind de Vries, Matsushita, Delétraz, Latifi and Sette Câmara.

Track position is important in Bahrain, but it soon became clear that tyre life is even more so: Latifi mugged Delétraz for P3 on lap 20 before blasting past Matsushita and de Vries to regain his lead on successive laps and starting to rebuild his big gap to the battle behind him, while Ghiotto got a double tow to blast by Sette Câmara and Delétraz on the front straight on lap 24, with the Brazilian following in his wake; earlier stops saw Matsushita and de Vries unable to stop the train coming for their potential podium positions a lap later.

With the top 3 storming off into the distance all eyes were looking behind them: Latifi ultimately claimed the win by 9s over Ghiotto with Sette Câmara a further 6s back, while Hubert did a superb job of managing his tyres to push up to P4 in his maiden F2 race ahead of Delétraz and de Vries, with Aitken ending a lonely race in P7 ahead of rookie Mick Schumacher, who mugged Matsushita on spent rubber on the last lap for 8th and tomorrow’s reverse pole, with Guanyu Zhou claiming the final point in P10.

Friday, March 22, 2019

TIME TO STOP THE SMOKE AND MIRRORS SHOW TOTO


With the Australian Grand Prix done and dusted, Mercedes again showed how mighty they are, despite propagating preseason testing fake news that their package was substandard and Ferrari were way ahead for the race in Melbourne.

The weekend Down Under proved that it was all lies, the W10 yet again a super piece of kit. In qualy Lewis Hamilton’s pole-winning effort was seven-tenths better than anything their rivals had under the skin and then, in the race, Valtteri Bottas drove into the distance winning by over 20 seconds, to Hamilton, 22 seconds to Verstappen and a whopping 57 seconds ahead of the best Ferrari.

Most teams would love to have the “problems” that Toto Wolff annually tells everybody his goliath of a team are experiencing, when in fact it’s all a smokescreen. Hence this open letter.

Dear Toto,

Congratulations on a most dominant victory at Albert Park, your guys produced another rocket ship, as they have for the past half dozen years and of course you cleaned up. But then you knew that would happen.

Before lashing out I will put it on record that the Mercedes F1 Team built under your watch is, in my book, the most potent F1 outfit in the history of the sport. McLaren in their heyday of the eighties, Williams in the nineties and Ferrari in noughties are simply no match. Bravo!

Ahead of the season opener you and your spin-doctors began spewing the disinformation that your package was suspect ahead of the new year and all us fools bought it as we have tended to over the years.

Again, it was a lie because when you unleashed what you had in Australia, under the impression Ferrari had more ammo, it was clear you still had a ton in reserve (maybe you showed too much on the day?) and your lads used it to great effect for the front row lockout and then claiming the top two steps of the podium 24-hours later. No victories are more emphatic.

Seb nailed it when he quizzed reporters during a press briefing after FP2 in Melbourne, “What was all that bullshit about them: Oh, we’re so out of shape and so on?”

It’s time to stop the bullshit by illustrating the damage you do to your own legacy with the disinformation you disseminate by laying out my version of a conspiracy theory spawned by your years of dishonesty in this regard, namely claiming your team have issues when there were never any while keeping the real advantage under wraps.

Since around 2014 when your outfit produced the most magnificent engine package in the history of the sport, savvy as you are, you realised what you had in your control – this awesome PU – was so good that it could destroy the sport.

You had to detune your package that year as your rivals tripped up over themselves trying to master the technology while trying in vain to challenge your team.

You dominated that year, but it worried you because destroying much-loved rivals is hardly endearing. The haters were growing. F1 was in trouble, and so were you.

Your solution, dropping off the ‘How To Build A Winning F1 Engine’ manual at Maranello in an effort to Ferrari up to speed with the new technology which your crew had mastered so effectively. Of course, vehement denials ensued.

But, after witnessing Ferrari enjoy a remarkable surge in the power unit stakes the first to smell a rat and go public was Red Bull’s Helmut Marko who in early 2005 said, “It is difficult to prove, but I am sure that Mercedes helped Ferrari. And we all know why.”

Marko suspected the motives were political and claimed it was not just Mercedes’ desire to address suggestions it was damaging F1 by dominating so effortlessly. The Red Bull consultant suggested that the ulterior was by helping the Scuderia they made an important ally with regards to the future of F1 being mapped right now.

At that time Sport Bild reported that Mercedes may even have slowed its own development programme over the winter, and had recommended that Ferrari sign up its hybrid specialist Wolf Zimmermann.

Tellingly, Sauber engineer Giampaolo Dall’Ara said of the Ferrari’s 2015 engine, “We expected an improvement, but such great progress in such a short space of time is difficult to explain.”

But of course, it was all hearsay until a year later F1 chief Bernie Ecclestone (with a finger in every single pie in the paddock) said as much in a dual interview with you and even accused you of not helping enough!

Suddenly with an incredibly dominant engine package, you found yourself pulling the strings, as you realised that you can control who wins and who loses, you can decide when it will be a close race and when not, you can control the cars, you can control your drivers, you are the F1 god because of your incredible engine.

[Bear with me this is a long and mean conspiracy theory.]

Moving on to the subject of drivers, with your finger on the horsepower trigger, you deemed Lewis should win titles in 2014 and 2015 which he duly did; your team claiming the constructors’ title in dominant style too.

So much so that at one point Felipe Massa was on record saying that he wished he had the same power unit package, your lads had on their Silver Arrows, on his Williams.

At the time the Brazilian told Globo, “If we have the same engine [as Mercedes] we can reduce the advantage. We do not have a better car than them, but they have a very good car and an engine that is a bit better than all of the others.”

A week later a remorseful Massa recanted: “The engine we have is exactly the same as the engine of Mercedes. It is the same engine and I am absolutely certain.”

His reward, five years later, a drive in your wife’s Formula E team. Just saying.

Then, after Lewis’s second pounding of Nico, a word in your ear from the big bosses at Daimler requested that a German driver, instead of the Pom, doing the business for a change would be good for the brand.

Comes 2016, you oblige and give Nico the additional horses… and boom he wins the title with Lewis, still aggrieved about that season to this day, immediately flinging this cryptic pearl: “You’ll have to buy my book in 10 years’ time to find out exactly what happened… It will be an interesting read.”

Granted, that was said after you swapped Lewis’ title-winning crew with Nico’s losers which was simply a smokescreen to hide the fact that you were staging the whole thing.

After all, you control the power-boost button, that’s what makes the real difference during a course of a two-hour race, not a dozen guys who come into the picture for less than ten seconds on a Sunday afternoon.

Furthermore, I will suggest that when Lewis looked like he might snatch it late in 2016, you pressed the ‘Engine Blow Up’ button in Malaysia and the bullet-proof Merc went up in smoke like never before. Rosberg won the title. The bosses in Stuttgart were happy. Lewis was not.

So for 2017 and 2018, you gave your superstar maximum power to keep him pacified. Why were you so cruel to Valtteri last year? Maybe to maximise the sensation of the wingman coming good this year in another of your premeditated scripts?

Credit to your conscience for deciding that 2019 you will offer Valtteri a serious crack at it by cranking up his package, or was that only for Australia? What’s next in the script you have concocted?

All signs are that in Melbourne you handed the wingman more HP than you wanted to and he nearly beat Lewis to pole, but then did trounce him in the race. On that day it would have been ghastly to deny your protege yet again.

The Valtteri Reloaded idea is smart, people love an underdog and Lewis ‘the brad’ is becoming bigger than Merc. Time to reel him in maybe? It makes sense for Valtteri to win the title this year, thereafter target Schumi’s records with Lewis. That should pacify him.

Despite all this, my prediction for Bahrain is that suddenly Mercedes horsepower will go AWOL after the Melbourne overindulgence, as you down tune things so Ferrari don’t look so bad and give credence to the crap that the Melbourne race was an anomaly.

It was no anomaly, you overestimated what the Reds had in their arsenal for the first qualy of the season, you turned it up on the Silver Arrows a tad too much (seven-tenths too much) and as we now know Ferrari had no answer.

That’s my theory.

“What bullshit!” I can imagine you will react in the unlikely chance you will read this. Fake News! Malicious conspiracy theory! I hear you say. Perhaps, but all fueled by you.

Downplaying your own team’s greatness in a ill-informed attempt to save F1’s credibility, pretending Mercedes in F1 are not a superpower beyond the reach of the rest is a slap in the face to everyone who follows this sport, including everyone in the paddock and every single one of your staff, Lewis and Valtteri included.

Do you take us all as fools? I don’t think I would be alone in betting you have at least a full second, if not more, in reserve for when needed.

What to do?

Accept your dominance as we have all been forced to do, relish it and wear it with pride, you have assembled the mightiest F1 team in history, you should not be apologetic for the repetitive success and feel the need to spew fake news to pacify us masses.

Just imagine Ken Tyrrell, Colin Chapman, Enzo Ferrari, Ron Dennis, Frank Williams, Jean Todt even Christian Horner during their heyday, and dominant best, being coy in the face of victory, so humble or so deceitful. If their common sporting spirit was Mohammed Ali, then you are Mother Theresa.

Their attitude, true of champions, was: we are the best, we are unbeatable, catch us if you can, kick them when they are down, win at all costs etc etc and fuck the fallout.

Your condescending sympathy for your prey is akin to older boys playing footie with kids in the park, the bigger lads make the young guys shine, egg them on, but always beat them by a goal or more and demonstrate condescending pity for the defeated little guys allowing to believe they had a chance.

In closing, the purpose of this letter – from an admirer of your achievements as Merc team chief – is to give you a heads up, because the “bullshit” is tarnishing your legacy as the man who led the mightiest team this sport has ever known, instead, you will be remembered as the guy who cried wolf once too often, ultimately exposing you as the puppet-master and race fixer of this era in F1.

It is time to stop the bullshit that fuels the conspiracy theories

Cheers

PV

Sunday, March 3, 2019

WHEN SENNA TESTED FOR BRABHAM-BMW



That year Senna had triumphed over Martin Brundle in a historic British Formula 3 Championship duel.

In July, the Brazilian had a guest test in the Williams FW08C at Donnington, his first taste of F1 which impressed Frank Williams, but there was no place in the team for him as Keke Rosberg and Jacques Lafitte inked into deals for 1984.

In October that year, Senna tested for McLaren at Silverstone, ‘spied’ on with interest by Brabham sporting boss Herbie Blash. At that test, Senna impressed but Ron Dennis, with Alain Prost and Niki Lauda on his books, could only offer the Brazilian a Formula 2 season.

A test with Toleman followed and in the end, the minnows were the team that would allow Senna to race for them without conditions, which the likes of McLaren and Williams were not prepared to risk.

Information about the Brabham test is scarce, but suffice to say it did not go well for Senna who was only given a handful of laps in the car and was unable to impress on the day.

On the day the Gordon Murray penned, BT52 ran on Michelin tyres and was powered by the potent BMW M12/13 turbocharged engine which in 1983 produced about 850 bhp (630 kW) in qualifying trim, detuned to around 640 bhp (480 kW) for race distances.

Respected F1 journo Flavio Gomes wrote on his blog that Piquet went out on track first, did a few laps and popped a 1:05.90 around a shortened version of the French Grand Prix venue. With Piquet’s setup the three young guns were let loose in the Brabham BT52B BMW.

These were the times:
Nelson Piquet 1:05.90
Mauro Baldi 1:07.80
Ayrton Senna 1:07.90
Roberto Guerrero 1:08.60
Pierluigi Martini1:08.90

Senna was a couple of seconds slower than regular driver, double F1 World Champion, Nelson Piquet and a tenth shy of fellow rookie Baldi.

In the end, neither of the trio who tested that day would be chosen to partner Piquet as Brabham opted later for Teo Fabi on the behest of Parmalat, who were the title sponsors and wanted an Italian in the team.

Furthermore, it was well known at the time that Piquet was not keen on having the younger Brazilian as his teammate, and acted accordingly.

Senna later said of his day with Ecclestone’s team, “My worst test, of course, was with Brabham at Ricard. I had the feeling I could do a lot more, but the opportunity was not there.”

Despite the shortcomings, 23-year-old Senna said in an interview, “If Bernie wants me he must improve his offer and reach a reasonable position. If he does that I could drive for them.”

As for the offer, Senna insisted it was not only about money, “There are several items, it is not just one single thing. It’s all the elements that go into a contract that will weigh whether we sign or not. I need recognition for what I achieved so far and the perspectives for the future that I have in Formula 1.”

History shows that he did not sign for Ecclestone’s team, instead he took the option of driving for underdogs Toleman in 1984 on his terns and the rest, as they say, is history.

Friday, March 1, 2019

Formula One Group operating loss grew in 2018

Payments to Formula 1 teams slid for the second year in a row during 2018 while the sport’s revenues and operating loss grew, according to annual results published by commercial rights holder Liberty Media released on Thursday.

Total payments to the 10 teams fell to $913-million from $919 million in 2017 and $966-million in 2016.

Although the Formula One Group reported an increase in annual revenues to $1,827-million, up $44-million from a previous $1,783-million, the operating loss grew from $37 million to $68 million.

Primary Formula 1 revenue from race promotion fees, broadcasting fees and advertising and sponsorship was stable despite an increase from 20 to 21 races, with other F1 revenue showing 13 percent growth.

“Race promotion revenue increased modestly primarily due to contractual increases in race promotion fees, as well as a contract amendment for one event,” Liberty said.

“This contract amendment was neutral for total Primary F1 revenue. In addition, race promotion revenue in 2018 was impacted by the calendar variance, with the non-occurrence of the Malaysian Grand Prix in 2018 not fully offset by the return of two European races in France and Germany.”

U.S.-based Liberty said advertising and sponsorship revenue had decreased for the full year.

The growth in other F1 revenue was due primarily to higher logistics revenue, digital media and TV production-related revenue as well as fan engagement activities.

Liberty, who took over the sport in 2017 and ousted former commercial supremo Bernie Ecclestone, said the bigger operating loss was due mainly to increased costs as the business continued to invest.

“Cost of F1 revenue increased primarily due to logistics and travel expense, higher costs associated with providing the chassis and component parts to F2 and GP3 teams, digital media development and spend on fan engagement, which more than offset reduced team payments,” it added.